Saddam's death
This is Jono talking. I don’t know what the rest of you think about this really, but I’ve been considering Saddam Hussein’s execution, and I can’t settle on an opinion. On the one hand, he was a maniac, right? He killed and tortured G-d knows how many innocent people as an insane dictator who was in possession of WMD’s (at some point, at least). But on the other hand, the humanitarian argument aside, I’m not sure executing him was a good tactical move.
Considering that, when we entered Iraq, the plan was to secure a quick victory—once Saddam was captured, especially, there would be no real resistance to US forces; what little there was would quickly decentralize and collapse. But as we all now know (and as some of us were saying back then), that was about as far from the reality of the situation as the Bush Administration could’ve gotten.
So when I consider Saddam’s execution, I don’t really see it as proving (and certainly not curing) anything. I’ll admit that I’m not an expert on the Middle East, but the way I see it, the best-case scenario here is that nothing changes, because none of the guerrillas combating US troops in Iraq really care about Saddam Hussein’s survival; the worst-case is an immense backlash.
Granted, events could play out completely differently, and I could look back on this post in six months and scoff at my stupidity. But while I admit that’s a possibility, I don’t really believe it. Maybe Saddam truly did deserve to die—I really don’t know and it’s not my place to make those decisions—but I don’t think that it was necessarily a good move.
— Jono