Welcome, Guest!

Editorial: It's time to learn from our crosstown neighbor

Tags:

By the 2005-06 Gargoyle Senior Editors
Posted Friday, June 30, 2006, The OG, opinions

Uni could take a lesson from St. Thomas More High School.

According to their Web site, our Catholic friends from across the way raised $150,000 in a single night by hosting a spring charity gala to benefit their school. With guests paying as much as $500 per ticket, such a windfall of cash is to be expected. We believe Uni should resort to similarly styled parties as a supplement to asking parents to write checks.

According to Newsweek, Uni is a “public elite” school. We don't pay thousands of dollars in tuition, and we still receive an education on the level with the nation's top private schools. Surely, then, parents and Uni alums are willing to throw stacks of cash at the feet of the administration, correct?

This is not the case, unfortunately. Each and every year, Uni seems to struggle to meet its fund-raising goals.

Why couldn't Uni, with an enrollment size comparable to St. Thomas More's, throw a similar gala featuring overpriced food, program ads, and a live auction?

Many families who normally would have no interest in giving large sums of money to the school might feel differently with an event such as a gala. Nobody sees who sends the biggest checks to Uni every year, but many families might feel encouraged to turn out for an evening fund-raiser and show their support for Uni.

While $500 per ticket seems like an outrageous price, this figure could be lowered to become more palatable to Uni parents while still drawing in a significant amount of money. Even though a lesser figure would be more inviting, there is no reason why the STM parents should be able to put up more money than the Uni crowd. The vast majority of our students have parents who work in professional fields and have incomes similar to those of private school parents.

Aside from similar levels of family affluence, Uni students do not pay tuition. The parents at STM donated $150,000 in one night in addition to paying $5,000 annual tuition. Our parents should certainly be able to come close to that.

The greatest advantage in fund-raising that Uni has over STM is a well-developed alumni base. STM was created less then 10 years ago, and it does not have the economically powerful alumni that Uni does. Uni, on the other hand, has been host to some of the brightest and now most successful people in the country. A fund-raising gala would surely attract not only current parents but Uni alums as well.

Some might say that the elitism of such an event is antithetical to what Uni is about. The financial benefits of such an event would outweigh the cost of the transient alienation for an evening or two per year. Some look at prom with similar disgust.

It is time to finally fix Uni's age-old financial situation. All we need are a couple good parties each year, and that mission will finally be accomplished.

Comments

I personally don't like this idea at all, but if we do decide to do it, I strongly suggest that families and alumni are polled before it is seriously considered. Here are my issues:For one thing, by sending their kids to STM--a private school with a major tuition--many of the parents are already saying they're willing to pay whatever is necessary to give their kids an education. (I say "many" instead of "all" because there are families who receive financial assistance, but those aren't going to be the ones going to fund-raising galas, anyway.) High cost is kinda what private schools are all about. Uni parents don't all necessarily feel that they have that much money to spare for giving to the school; they aren't coming here knowing they'll have to pay at least $5000 each year. And okay, some parents may be high-paying professionals, but not all. This whole idea will definitely raise some eyebrows; it's definitely about elitism. Prom isn't a fair comparison; almost all schools do that traditionally, while only some private schools would throw an event like this. What if some of the alumni are put off by this idea and think it goes against the spirit of the school? That wouldn't help with fundraising. We want to make Uni seem like a place where all people are welcome, regardless of financial situation, right? But if we do this and word gets around--as it did for STM's--everyone will just think we're just another private-esque school (albeit for smart "rich kids"). That's really not what we aspire to, image-wise. Maybe we would raise some money with this kind of thing, but I don't think it can entirely "fix Uni's age-old financial situation" unless a large percentage of each class were willing to come and contribute, which is why we'd have to survey everyone first before we try this to make sure it'll work. There's no point in doing it if we're just going to hurt our image.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <p> <br> <br />
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Word Verification
Please verify that you are human by correctly translating the image into text.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.