Welcome, Guest!

Column: The power of the petition

Tags:
danaognew.jpg

DANA AL-QADI
Gargoyle senior editor
Posted Saturday, Jan. 13, 2007
Opinions

WHAT COULD POSSIBLY persuade Director/Principal Kassie Patton to allow the entire class of 63 subfreshmen to attend a United for Uganda lock-in that was originally intended to be a freshman/sophomore event? An elegantly worded petition complete with plenty of scrawled names, of course.

The potential inclusion of such a large number of lock-in participants threw the event organizers into a mode of panic. Could that many people fit on the first floor? If not, there would need to be more chaperones. Would more parents be willing to chaperone on such short notice? What about vittles? Would local businesses be willing to donate even more food?

But the organizers need not have worried. Apparently, a vast majority of the subfreshmen who signed their names on the petition had no intention of attending the lock-in when they scribbled their John Hancocks.

Whether the dispute over the attendance of subbies at such an event is justified or not, the point is this has sparked controversy.

Whether the freshmen who now refuse to attend because of the inclusion of the younger class are being petty or not, the point is several freshmen who had originally agreed to go have changed their minds explicitly because the subbies will be there.

Whether enough subbies turn up to warrant the significant amount of time spent by the event organizers to accommodate them has yet to be seen, but the point is the time was spent.

None of the aforementioned issues is even of that much importance, at least not enough for me to take time out of my day to write a column about. The important issue is that many of the subfreshmen who signed the petition had no intention of attending in the first place.

“Well, the class officers told me to sign it, so I did,” was a sentiment echoed by the majority of the class.

But who hasn't signed their name onto a clipboard without truly examining what they were signing merely to get the cheerful and enthusiastic activist out of their path? I see raised hands. Or just for fun? Oh and look, I see some more.

“Yeah, you know the Allerton petition from last year? I signed that, and I wasn't even a freshman — just because,” remarked one Uni student.

The problem with signing petitions without either being dedicated to what is being signed or at minimum harboring vested interest in the cause is that oftentimes petitions do have power.

Petitions got the subfreshmen included in the lock-in.

Petitions got Facebook to swiftly add more privacy options to counteract its mini-news feed.

Petitions got the Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania included in NATO in 2004.

When you sign a petition, you are sending essentially two messages. The first is to the opposing group, ultimately a message of conviction regarding the issue in question. The second is to the group you are supporting, a message of dedication and solidarity. It is not fair to either side to attach yourself to an issue that you have no intention of pursuing or following.

If the majority of the subfreshman class had no intention of attending the lock-in and did not sign the petition, then this would be a nonissue. Instead, the signers created an issue when there was no need for one. It took time to review the petition. It took discussions to reach a decision. For what outcome? Toward what end?

As Uni students, we often talk about the privileges and opportunities we have and the expectations that come along with those blessings. We participate in volunteer activities because it is our duty to give back to the community. We discuss and debate issues because it is our responsibility to care about our surroundings.

But isn't our most basic responsibility to be honest with our community? If you don't care about the troops in Iraq, don't sign the petition. If the reproduction habits of pandas in captivity doesn't inspire you, don't sign the petition. If you don't plan on attending an event, don't sign the petition.

If your heart really desires to sign something, practice your signature incessantly on scrap pieces of notebook paper so that when the perfect petition does come along, you can scrawl your name down in two seconds flat with simply perfect form.

But save that perfect signature for petitions that matter.

Comments

Dana I appreciate your point about petitions, but I would ask as well how many of those Freshman and Sophomores who raised their voices in dismay were planning on coming? A majority of the Subbies signed perhaps with no intention of coming but with belief in the cause, just as a possible majority are voicing disbelief whether they planned to be there or not. I would say anyone who canceled because the Subbies were going to be there was not very dedicated to being there in the first place. For that matter, since you are a senior, isn't this a non-issue for you? Democracy in action, Dana. At Uni, Subbies have rights too.

Personally, I believe the subbies have as much right to the lock-in as any other students and if many of them were convinced in the cause of allowing their fellow subfreshmen the option of attending, even if they themselves had no intention of participating, I have no issue. Along those lines, the freshmen and sophomores who initially refused to attend because of the attendance of the younger class not only forget that they were subbies a year or two ago themselves, but are completely missing the point of such activities besides fundraising: class bonding and school unity. My column is merely broaching the issue of petitions in general. A topic which was inspired by the power of the subbie petition. Their petition ultimately changed the protocol of the entire event. I used the Allerton example to direct my argument beyond the subfreshman class. The bottom line is that I felt this ample oppurtunity to express my opinion of petitions and how they should be used, not to critize any one class or their inclusion in school activities.

Many subfreshman signed that petition to support our class in challenging that injustice with no intention of attending. Someone can support the troops in Iraq without joining them on the battle-field, to use your example.

I have been asked to sign petitions to get candidates from third (or fourth, or seventeenth) parties on election ballots. Sometimes I sign, sometimes I don't. When I do sign, it's because I believe in the democratic process, and want people to have choices, even if I don't plan to vote for the particular candidate. When I don't sign, either I believe the candidate is unsuitable for office, or, more likely, I don't want MY candidate to lose votes to the new candidate. I applaud the subbies who signed, and didn't plan to attend: they support the principle.

"Someone can support the troops in Iraq without joining them on the battle-field, to use your example." How? Enlighten me, I beg of you.

I must agree with Mr. Russell, and applaud him: It seems to demonstrate a great amount of maturity and thoughfulness for subbies who did not plan on attending to sign this petition, because while they themselves would not take the opportunity given to them, they were still, in fact, giving their classmates the opportunity. I would also just like to say that you (plural) are blowing this out of proportion. Cheers!

Personally I think that Subbies are starting to reallize that people don't really think of us as part of this school since we aren't officially in high school yet. We just want ourselves to be noticed. It isn't all about the upperclassmen. I do think that because of all the work they have done they deserve glory, but we deserve a chance.

I realize that two columns were posted within very close timing to one another and I also realize that they pertain to the same subject. However, I feel that people are lumping the two together and not paying attention to the message I had in mind when I initially wrote this. My column is about petitions. Not about subbies. Not about upperclassmen. Not about glory. Or chances. It is about signing a petition when it matters to you. So if you were a subbie who signed the petition because you wanted your little buddies to have the option to scamper around all night with the other kids...good for you. Seriously. Yes, it is mature. What I do not agree with is merely signing because its there or because someone asked you to. Any petition. Not just ones about lock-ins. I felt that I needed to clarify because by the tone of these comments, it seems that a 'subbie issue' is being brought up over and over. There is a different column for that. I like subbies. But my column is not about them, it is about something bigger.

"I like subbies. But my column is not about them, it is about something bigger." Now now Dana, there's no need for height jokes. (Hehe, let's all not laugh at the horrible pun). But seriously, I saw what you were trying to say when you wrote this. I'm sure everyone's signed a petition complaining about a certain teacher, and then regretted it afterwards...I know I have a middle school story about that. -Ben

I don't mean to be a bother (alright...maybe a little), but it appeared to me that what you said in the article was essentially, "If you're not going to go, why did you sign it?" based on the fact that the "majority" of the class said "they only signed it because the officers told them to." Clearly you didn't spend two weeks on the third floor. Most of the subbies were signing it after the purpose of the petition in front of them was clearly explained. Jenny, Simone, and Will all made sure to say, "You're not expected to go," to everyone who signed it. Even when the petition was placed in front of them, they usually asked, "What's it for?" and the response was usually, "For subbies to go to the lock-in." So I now wonder what you mean by "majority".

Even if the purpose of the petition was clearly explained to each and every last subbie who signed it, it still doesn't excuse the fact that the petition put a massive strain on the members of UFU who were in charge of planning the event. Instead of appealing to Ms. Patton, maybe you should have talked to Mandy and Bianca so that they could put in a word on the situation. When they were told to suddenly make room for subbies, they had to consider radically changing their plans for the event in order to accommodate the possible inclusion of an extra sixty people. The fact that they were put through that so that a total of around six subbies could go to a lock-in is very unfair.

Maybe they wouldn't have been panicking with extra people if they hadn't cancelled our lock-in. Sixty subbies did NOT show up to the lock-in. In fact, sixty people didn't show up from any single grade. The members of the UFU weren't 'put through that' for SIXTY subbies, though they did work very hard to provide for the sudden change in plans.

Okay. 1) We did not cancel any subbie lock-in, so I'm not sure where that came from. 2) Everyone needs to read the actual news story (UFU's latest lock-in sparks controversy) actually know what you're talking about. A lot of you are making great arguments, but unfortunately, the majority of these comments are based on information that is just wrong. UFU had a Jr/Sr lockin, and it went well. So we decided we could have another one, logically for the Fr/Sophs. If that went well, we might try to have another one this year, for the subbies. If we couldn't manage to plan it, we figured it wouldn't be the end of the end of the world, because the subbies would have plenty of opportunities in the future as well. But UFU was then notified that the subbies were coming to this lockin. It was annoying that we had no say in it, and that it was very short notice, but it was NOTHING AGAINST THE SUBBIES PERSONALLY!! I like the subbies just fine!! We were scared that we'd have too many people. The lockin was supposed to be on one floor only, because you need chaperones everywhere at all times. But if a lot of subbies were coming, we thought we'd need to open up another floor, (and to do that, we would need a lot more chaperones, which are pretty hard to get, if you can imagine). So it was an annoying situation, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with anyone being a subbie or not. Then a bunch of freshmen and sophomores started to talk about how they wouldn't come because the subbies were coming. THAT was very annoying indeed. But we figured if people were going to be that immature and petty, then they weren't worth stressing out about anyways. But then at the last minute, lots of people signed up. We had a total of 85 people, approximately 25 from each class. The lockin was just fine. The subbies seemed a little scared of/uncomfortable around the freshmen and sophomores, but they still ( i think) had a nice time. the freshmen got to feel big and strong because the subbies were there , and the sophomores got to feel really cool because they were "in charge". But mostly, I thought everyone got along just fine. I made a couple of friends that were sophomores that I wouldn't normally get to talk to, and I got to spend time with some subbies and freshmen too. i really enjoyed it too. why? because they're cool. yes, there is a difference between someone who has experienced all of high school and is about to go off to college (me), and someone who is barely beginning their teenage years. if you try to pretend there isn't, you're not thinking hard enough, and you're not giving enough credit to all the many experiences you will learn from and struggle through throughout high school. *I* am very different than I was when I was a subbie, and can fairly say that I have developed QUITE a lot. But that does not mean being condescending towards subbies because they're "subbies," or freshmen because you're a senior, or a 13-year old because you're 15. No. But you GOTTA give everyone the respect they deserve, who are you to pretend you're too good to give other people respect? You're not too good, whatever you are, a "mature" subbie, a freshman, a senior, whatever. I'm not either, and i know it. Seriously, get over yourselves, at least a little bit!

In my previous comment I said, "A lot of you are making great arguments, but unfortunately, the majority of these comments are based on information that is just wrong." Well, that's sort of an exaggeration, and I'll admit it :) However, I do think that everyone should read the news article about the Lock-in once more, in order to understand what actually happened (before passing judgement on something that may not even be true...)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <p> <br> <br />
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Word Verification
Please verify that you are human by correctly translating the image into text.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.