Welcome, Guest!

Film review: "The Departed"

Tags:

By Michael Belmont
Gargoyle sports editor
Posted Thursday, Nov. 16, 2006, The OG, arts

movie
Leonardo DiCaprio in “The
Departed” (click to enlarge)

DIRECTOR MARTIN SCORSESE'S newest work, “The Departed,” is like that cocky, smart-mouthed, crass jerk who entertains everybody but forms lasting friendships with nobody. If you're not put off by the grisly violence, you'll enjoy your viewing time for the pervasive dirty punchlines, the colorful characters, the gripping suspense, and, well, the grisly violence that puts everything in context. However, your departure from the movie is sure to be awkward, your pleasure void once you leave the theater.

“Do you do well in school?” Jack Nicholson's character, mafia boss Frank Costello, asks his future protege Colin Sullivan when he's just a boy in the movie's opening scene. “So did I. That's what they call a paradox.” That's precisely what “The Departed” ends up being: a paradox more frustrating than intriguing.

How could a story so deftly crafted and smoothly performed leave viewers so dissatisfied? Scorsese's main offense is an ending that attempts to be surprising, but is really just random and even more contorted than some of the corpses you see on screen. The message that comes across is that none of the desperate life or death struggles that dominated the story really matter, and you can't help feeling as the lights come on in the theater that you were a little ripped off.

The premise itself is wonderfully symmetric, and the cast, even among the supporting characters, is superb: Matt Damon is the adult Colin Sullivan, the “immaculate” polished good guy who's actually a bad guy, and Leonardo DiCaprio is Billy Costigan, the violent scumbag bad guy who's actually a good guy.

Mark Wahlberg is Dignam, the cop who hates them both, and Vera Farmiga is Madolyn, the sultry shrink who loves them both. Jack Nicholson turns in a truly great performance as Costello, a mass murderer straight from hell, while Martin Sheen is Oliver Queenan, the fatherly undercover police controller who fights for what's right. The smell of rat makes them all sick, and by the end everybody's losing their mind.

The storyline moves at just the right pace, and manages to be simple enough so as not to be opaque, but sophisticated enough so as not to be dull. The male characters are lively, pugnacious, and loud, but the most important ones also have refreshing depth. The few female characters are at least very attractive, though insubstantial and kind of vapid (guys will tend to like this movie a lot more than girls for multiple reasons).

The race to uncover the identities of the rival infiltrators of the dueling organizations is so close that, in a way, it's understandable that the screenwriter William Monahan decides to bail himself out at the end, however annoying. More interesting than “The Aviator” and less formulaic than “Gangs of New York,” “The Departed” is Scorsese's best movie in recent years, whatever its shortcomings.

There are some of you out there who might appreciate the abruptness and morbid simplicity of the final blows, but for many more of you the lack of a truly great culminating twist will be irritating. There are no clues in the main body of the movie to indicate the key development that defines the outcome, so don't try too hard to guess. Your best bet is simply to sit back, relax, enjoy the show, and maybe leave a few minutes early.

“The Departed” is now playing at the Beverly Cinema 18 (click here for times). Runtime: 152 minutes. Rated: R.

Comments

Michael you're so wrong about the ending, well your right, but I can't believe you of all people wouldn't appreciate its "contorted" nature. It's not one of those movies with the pseudo fairy tale ending where there may have been some loss but on the whole the good guys win. It's gritty and perhaps true to life just like the rest of the movie. It was an amazing ride, just like you said, and it went out with a bang. Best movie of the year so far.

Yes, Yes, Yes...That is it Michael you are so right watched it and i was seating there on the last few seconds praying it did end because i was still expecting a big twist. dont get me wrong the film is excellent but i hate the ending, so simple. maybe i just excpected a little to much a bigger twist or something but i cant help being disapointd or as you put it " a little ripped off"

How else could the film end? What ending would you suggest? Dignam has to exact his revenge by killing Sullivan. Sullivan killed his mentor and friend. I was left wondering whether Queenan was a crooked cop when I realised he was a good guy. Many of you are forgetting that most of the principals are now dead (including French, Costello, Costigan etc.. leaving only Sullivan alive). It only follows the progression of the film that he die; especially since he clearly deserves it. A rogue cop like that is just as bad as Costello. Notice how Sullivan kills Costello when many viewers might have thought that Costigan would. He finds out that the very person who made him crooked is an FBI informant. Notice how minor charactors like Sullivan's buddy from training end up in critical scenes. I like the way Sullivan is ready to die for the 2nd time. When Costigan attempts to arrest him on the building roof, Sullivan, after being beaten by Costigan, asks him to shoot him. In the last scene at his appartment, he is prepared to be shot by Dignam (Walburg). So, what other logical way could this film end? Maybe we could see Sullivan a year later leading an "elite" group of corrupt cops. I thought that seeing that rat running across the balcony railing against the backdrop of the mosque was an interesting choice. This is the film of the year and one of the best Scorcese films to date.

did it occurr to anyone else that Dignam might have been the highest rat of them all? Something about the package that Costigan gave to the shrink, which undoubtedly said to contact Dignam with the truth, made me wonder. If Dignam was the big rat, upon being contacted, he would have been over at Sullivan's apartment to kill the only two people that knew the truth, the shrink and Sullivan. Leaving behind evidence of the recordings of voice calls between Sullivan and Costello could make Dignam's hit look like a mafia style one to which he would not be tied.

I started thinking about

I started thinking about that... but... BUT... Dignam would not be the rat. He knew the identity of Costigan from the beginning. If not the beginning, he knew later on. After all he was the one of only three people who knew the codes too.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <p> <br> <br />
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Word Verification
Please verify that you are human by correctly translating the image into text.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.