Welcome, Guest!

Film review: "An American Carol" is funny, but tactless

"AN AMERICAN CAROL"
Starring Kevin Farley, Jon Voight, James Woods, Dennis Hopper
Released: Oct. 3, 2008

WATCH THE TRAILER

Funny, but the intensely patriotic vibes and intolerant connotations are nothing less than irritating.

"A CHRISTMAS CAROL" … the epitome of Christmas cheer, a heart-warming story about a miserly old man who loves no one and nothing more than cynicism. Visited by the ghosts of Christmas past, present, and future, the man revises his view of the world and finds himself full of joy.

Obviously, a film titled "An American Carol" is going to steal the plot of Dickens' story. What's surprising — given Hollywood's liberal reputation — is that this one does so in the name of conservative politics.

Based in recent times, about a man with a complete disdain for everything American, this movie seeps patriotic subliminal messages. Except the subliminal part fails most of the time.

The movie's main character, Malone (played by Kevin Farley), is a satire of the infamous Michael Moore, and a zealot in the most extreme sense.

This film, directed by David Zucker of "Airplane!" fame, does raise valid criticisms of Moore and the occasional absurdity of the liberal movement.

It was definitely refreshing to hear those things criticized, because liberalism gets out of control and pretentious a lot of the time. It wasn't the criticisms that were irksome, but the movie's undertones of blind patriotism.

Malone decides that our most patriotic holiday, the Fourth of July, celebrates a new nation that is full of offensive people doing offensive things and should not be celebrated. His liberal ideas and actions put him at odds with the rest of his family, especially his nephew, a Naval officer about to be deployed to the Persian Gulf.

Against the war in the Middle East, Malone spends the movie attempting to establish a huge anti-Independence Day demonstration. The demonstration is a flop at first, and when he does get tons of supporters they're presented as dumb, one-dimensional mimickers, incapable of their own ideas.

The campaign to abolish the Fourth of July prompts the visit of the ghosts of JFK, George Washington, and General Patton to make Malone change his view on America. It's definitely funny to see those people brought back to life, although General Patton, the main ghost, was the by far the funniest, and the others weren't much more than cameos.

Interspersed with Malone's lessons from the spirits are Middle Eastern terrorists trying to commission Malone to make a suicide bomber trainee video. Malone is convinced that they want to star in his new documentary.

As a character, Malone is completely disgusting. He is constantly shot stuffing his face, once even eating a slice of pizza that a mouse had previously scampered all over. There are constant remarks on Malone’s odor, which Malone never takes seriously.

Then, of course, there’s his total lack of tact and just plain stupidity, which enables him to ignore all the clues the terrorists give off about their true identities.

In efforts that figuratively (and literally) slap some sense into him, Malone is shown British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain shining Adolf Hitler’s shoes during the signing of the Munich Agreement of 1938. And then he sees the amiable slaves at his own plantation in an alternate world where Lincoln was too scared to fight the Civil War.

The message? Liberal ideas, particularly those of peace, do not benefit the country. In fact, they are purely detrimental to everyone. Always. Period. Although the satirical commentary is definitely validated by the pretentiousness and blind faith in liberalism that is prevalent today, it's most certainly written from the viewpoint of very anti-liberal people, which makes it seem much less reliable.

Erika thought that the movie itself was a bit disappointing because of the lack of truly humorous events. She only found herself laughing at the antics of the terrorists, and at a group of injured and sick little kids (including a direct spinoff of Little Timmy from "A Christmas Carol"), whom Malone kept managing to further injure. In fact, she thought most of the happenings were just so ridiculous that they came off as stupid and a bit lame.

In the end, Lor thought that the film was decently funny. While the extreme anti-liberal connotations were just plain annoying by the end of the film and she kind of wanted to punch whoever had written it, it did make her laugh. However, the mostly physical comedy and lame plot killed it for her. She'd say it's fun for a laugh, but it wasn't worth the absurd price of a movie ticket.

"An American Carol" is no longer playing at the Goodrich Savoy 16, 232 W. Burwash, Savoy, or the Beverly 18, 910 Meijers Drive, Champaign. Look for it on DVD in the coming months.

"An American Carol" AT A GLANCE


Comments

This movie was not about

This movie was not about humor. This movie was about conservatives taking a stand (finally) in the completely left-biased media. It was a "coming out" of sorts for many republican actors who had previously kept their political identity secret. The reason two democrats who watched this movie didn't laugh so much is because only republicans could appreciate the insanely corrupt ACLU being torn apart (literally), the acknowledgement that universities (including ours) do indeed intend to brainwash their students, and poking fun at the terrorists who by no means will ever want worldwide peace. The end of the movie was most important and heartwarming in the face of this election. Finally, shots of our noble soldiers and service men and women are displayed over patriotic music! For once, someone is praising this country, which more people should be thankful for instead of trying to change it into a socialist regime!!
Kelsey Grammar was definitely the best.

Dear Madam/Sir

You rather frighten me.

Love, Andrew

Lor Sligar's picture

Did you read the review? I

Did you read the review?

I thought the movie was funny (as was intended!), and that it brought up valid points. Maybe I don't understand people thinking that "terrorists" (who automatically include all people in the Middle-East) will never want peace. Why would they? It's not like their homelands are being torn apart, or their familes and friends killed by foreign soldiers that they don't want in their countries. THEY'VE SAID SO.

This movie wasn't bad. I didn't say that. I said that the bias, one-sided view, and complete extremism were annoying. I literally really liked it until the ending, which was just pushing it too far. I also dislike extremely liberal films for the same reason! While it was eye-opening to see how other people think, it was extremely overzealous in it's attempts.

Woah, I didn't say

Woah, I didn't say terrorists included all people in the Middle East. I literally meant terrorists, just as the movie did.
I also didn't mean that you thought it specifically wasn't funny or good. I'm just explaining why republicans would appreciate this movie even more than democrats, and not just for humor, but especially those 'bias, one-sided, etc.' sorts of scenes you said weren't so entertaining.
Sorry for the confusion.

Lor Sligar's picture

Sorry, I probably

Sorry, I probably overreacted. But the criticisms the movie had of liberal movies overexaggerating (for example, in the beginning, which it parodied Sicko by saying Cuba wasn't as good as it seemed in that documentary) were also applicable to this movie in it's very simplified, only-the-good-points Republican connotations.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <p> <br> <br />
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Word Verification
Please verify that you are human by correctly translating the image into text.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.