The extreme of libertarianism is anarchy, so obviously, we don't want to tend to extremes. However, I don't think I agree with the idea that globalization implies regulation (which is, actually, a more liberal idea). You say: "To return to the yeoman farmer, he has expanded his opportunities and his importance in society, and thus requires maintenance by the government." But why does he require maintenance? Let the free market run its course! The farmer will either stay competitive or find another job--the government hardly has to get involved. A question--in a "global world," which government would control the farmer? His product is made on U.S soil but let's say 80% of it goes to a group in China. Who would have control? We've seen examples of this in the past--note the EU's recent attempts to control YouTube content. Interesting article, Sarah. Though I mostly disagree with you, you raise good points.