Welcome, Guest!

Column: Is the United States really losing in Iraq?

Tags:

By David Boyle
Gargoyle co-editor-in-chief
Posted Tuesday, March 7, 2006, The OG, opinions

Anybody who believes we are losing the war in Iraq is either naïve or truly ignorant of what our government hopes to accomplish.

Many Americans still believe we went to war to free the Iraqi people from tyranny, and to establish a westernized democratic state that is an American ally. Skeptics assert that the war was actually an attempt to boost profit for American oil corporations by giving them oil contracts in the reconstructed Iraq.

As Iraq descends into chaos and civil war, it appears as if none of these objectives has been accomplished. Republicans are becoming nervous while liberals joke about the stupidity and incompetence of our government. The joke is on them. The neoconservatives who are in charge know exactly what they are doing.

We are winning the war in Iraq for two reasons: Oil prices remain high, and the United States has destroyed a regime which was not a threat to our country but to our favorite ally, Israel.

Vice President Dick Cheney and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld know that controlling the Iraqi oil industry would be impossible, so they set out to do the second best thing: destroying it. Iraq is an economically unstable nation that has failed to maintain its oil production throughout the war, which raises oil prices for Americans. Even if oil companies aren't pumping crude from the Iraqi deserts, the oil they have secured already is worth more because Iraq is exporting less.

The Israel lobby groups have far-reaching power in Washington that is unseen by the public. Destabilizing Iraq into three different ethnic and religious factions means that instead of fighting Israel, Iraq is tied up in internal power struggles.

The only way there can be a unified Iraq is to have a dictator like Saddam Hussein. Iraq itself is a very artificial state made up of Shiites, Sunnis, and Kurds who, if given the option, would not live in the same state. Saddam didn't give them that option. He unified the three factions through tyranny, and as his power grew he became a growing threat to Israel, which was unacceptable to the powers that be in Washington.

We have to give our government credit where it is due; these are brilliant, but ruthless, people. Just as we fought the war in Vietnam to effectively wipe a strategic nation off the map, we are doing the same in Iraq and experiencing tremendous success. In the end, oil companies, investors, and Israel will reap the benefits.

Comments

So what do you really think? Lots of food for thought in this piece!

If the goal was high oil prices (a strange and unexplained logic), why not continue or strenghten the sanctions against Iraqi oil production. Going to war is a ridiculously more expensive proposition. As far as the Israeli conspiracy theory, it also makes little sense. Iraq is far from the greatest threat to Israel and only participated in minimal ways in past wars. A secular regime in Iraq that crushed fundamentalists was actually in Israel's interests as opposed to a potential failed state with many dangerous factions. It streches credulity to believe that the Bush administration is getting what it wanted out of Iraq. Fundamental miscalculations and failed policies are a better interpretation than some grand conspiracy theory.

Boyle, do you condone this behavior on the part of our leadership? The United States is supposed to be an example to the rest of the world, the "beacon at the top of the hill," a country that sets the standards for the rest of the world. If your theory were correct, then you have just depicted President Bush as equally dangerous if not more so than Saddam Hussein. If the American people are going to stand for this and allow our president to go around destroying whole nations just for his political gain, then what has this country come to? Also, your theory about the higher oil prices is hard to believe also. Look at what the inflation of crude oil prices has done to the gas prices per gallon in the US. These increasing gas prices have forced more people to find alternate means of transportation rather than get gouged at the pump. In all actuality, the higher oil/gas prices has the potential to have a detrimental effect on the economy of this country. With fewer people buying gas for their cars and resorting to more feasable methods such as public transportation or bicycles, less money is coming back around and stimulating the economy. In addition to that, fewer people are purchasing new vehicles, with the fear that they will not be able to afford to put fuel in their vehicles - so once again the economy is suffering because of this...just thought I'd enlighten you on a few of the finer points of your article, although I was impressed with what you wrote. I'll be coming to Champaign again soon, we should hang out again.

Um... Israel is our favorite ally now? When did this happen? Anyway, George W. Bush's stated "reasons" for going to war against Saddam Hussein were that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and that Hussein was giving money and/or support to terrorist organizations, both worthwhile reasons if they happened to be true. Evidence for either was never found. In justifying this hugely expensive war to the American people, our president said nothing about helping out allies by destroying pesky dictators for them. I also agree with the above comment about the global responsibility of the United States. Hasn't our country come to the point where we can rise above war for political goals or monetary rewards?

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <p> <br> <br />
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Word Verification
Please verify that you are human by correctly translating the image into text.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.