Column: Subfreshmen still have much to learn about responsibility and privilege

Tags:
isaac_col.jpg

ISAAC CHAMBERS
Gargoyle assistant online editor
Posted Saturday, Jan. 13, 2007
Opinions

THE SUBBIES SEEM to have struck another chord with many freshmen and sophomores recently with their petition to make the freshman/sophomore United for Uganda lock-in available to their class as well.

It's fairly pretentious of freshmen and sophomores previously planning to attend the lock-in to cancel at the last minute due to subbie attendance, but nevertheless, it should be considered whether subbies actually deserve the same privileges Uni's high school students have.

We all grow up learning that responsibility and privilege go hand in hand. Driving is a prime example of a privilege most states feel adolescents aren't ready for until the age of 16. This is because the potential consequences of driving are monumental. There is always a danger in moving thousands of pounds of metal and plastic at high speeds, and irresponsible driving increases the risks.

There are many other privileges we gain as we get older. When we are mature enough to deal with more explicit content, our parents let us watch PG-13 and R-rated movies. When we show responsibility by doing homework or cleaning our rooms, we get privileges such as being able to watch TV.

Our development from the beginning of our childhood to the time we become adults (legally at least) is characterized by the increase in responsibility as well as privileges.

The Illinois government, for example, deems that we are not responsible enough to play games rated “M” for mature, or consent to sexual intercourse until the age of 17. The federal government also believes that citizens are not responsible enough to make intelligent political decisions until we reach the age of 18, at which time we can vote. Likewise, drinking alcohol is illegal under the age of 21. With each of these “privileges” comes big potential ramifications.

Drinking irresponsibly can cause harm to yourself and others unless you are mature enough to make smart decisions such as not drinking and driving and not binge drinking to the extent that you are at risk for alcohol poisoning. Making irresponsible sexual choices can lead to unwanted pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections.

Of course, that's not to say that all people over the legal age granting someone a privilege are responsible enough to deal with that privilege, or by the same token, that all people under the legal age aren't responsible enough. There are plenty of people over 17 who make stupid sexual decisions and plenty of people over the age of 21 who drive under the influence.

But the legal system is not the main determinant of privilege and responsibility. As youth, our privileges and responsibilities are defined by our parents, our bosses, and our schools.

The balance of privileges and responsibilities is very clear at Uni. To start with, there are many privileges subbies have that Uni's high school students don't have.

Subbies don't have to worry about grades and GPAs because their grades don't go on their transcript.

Subbies can behave worse, be louder, break more rules, and make more mistakes without the same consequences. This can be seen more generally in the real world as minors often face smaller consequences than adults who have committed the same crimes.

Subbies have less homework, less stress, more field trips, and easier courses.

High school years at Uni are harder and more stressful than subbie year, and on top of that, grades count. Sophomores must begin to think about college with the PLAN and PSAT, and college weighs heavily on the minds of juniors and seniors, having to worry about National Merit scholarships, the ACT and SAT, AP tests, and college applications.

The difference in privileges and responsibilities that exists between middle school students and high school students in most public school systems is big. Yes, the separation between subbies at Uni and high school students at Uni is not as big because we are in the same small school, but the difference remains, and remains for a reason.

Would Centennial students invite Jefferson students to their events? While no amount of subbies would be enough to stop me from having fun at this weekend's United For Uganda underclassman lock-in, it's worth putting the question forward: With all of the extra responsibilities Uni high school students have, isn't it fair that they also have extra privileges that subbies don't have?

After all, as subbies become freshmen, sophomores, juniors, and seniors, they will get these privileges at the same time they get new responsibilities. And when these subbies are high school students and have these privileges, they will not want the next batch of subbies to have them.

The lounge is not inherently special. It's a furniture graveyard that often smells pretty funky and is a good 10 to 15 degrees hotter than the rest of the school. The reason why the lounge is so desirable to upperclassmen is because it's a place on their floor where upperclassmen can be with their friends with a certain level of separation from the lower classes.

And should students get to go to prom as subbies, freshmen, and sophomores? I think not! Prom is a special occasion signifying for upperclassmen the end or beginning of their last year in high school. The prom is no longer special if anybody can go to it.

Discrimination is the unequal treating of people who are equal. Subbies are not equal to high school students in many ways, just as high school students are not equal to college students and adults in far more ways. The lounge and prom are examples of privileges that, when the time is right, will be gained.

Privileges are rewards for responsibility, and quite frankly I would often rather be in fourth grade with less work and less responsibility, even if it means I lose many of the privileges I have now. As we grow older, we also lose certain privileges — for example, we lose the privilege of recess as we transition from grade school to middle school.

I'm sure that as we finally become adults, we'll realize more than ever that privilege and responsibility is a trade-off.

Comments

isaac, i totally agree with you

Isaac, Driving? Drinking? Sex? Red herrings? I hope you appreciate your irony here. At a function aimed at raising funds to try to halt an injustice, you want to practice injustice. In my time at Uni, I thought the students took great pride in their willingness to work for equality and justice. You certainly seem more than willing to slight fellow students, and yes, the Subbies are your fellow students. Granted their grades don't go on their college transcipt, but if you don't think Subbies feel the stress and pressure of Uni, a school vastly more demanding than most of their middle schools, you must be practicing selective amnesia. All in all, I would put the maturity and responsibility of this "lower" class (honestly, Isaac!) up against many of their "upper" class peers. And they know better than to say "is because."

You tell 'im, Steve!

Maturity is subjective whereas having (or not having) responsibilities is not. I was careful about my use of the world maturity as maturity is certainly NOT an indication of age. Mainly, my point was that privileges and responsibility come together. Driving, sex, and alcohol are have the potential to be terribly bad just as they have the potential to be good. No risk, no reward, right? Yes, except that you decrease the risks if you are mature and responsible. Every time anybody gets in a car they are taking a risk that they will die or be seriously injured. But does that mean no one should use cars? Things like being in the lounge or attending a lock-in do not have negative consequences nor do they require extra maturity. Simply put, I was contending that it is fair that Upperclassman have more privileges than underclassman because they have more responsibilities. As far as grammar goes, this message was endorsed by Isaac-never-said-he-was-perfect-Chambers. Again here though, you are far more mature and have more responsibilities than me, and no amount of grammar mistakes you could possibly make would reflect anything otherwise.

I think this column is overly exaggerating the situation. The only reason the rest of the school is against the subbies having the same privileges is they couldn't do it when they were subbies so we shouldn't be allowed either. We are trying to qestion this order of injustice and are being punished for it. Yes, all of you students out there, SUBBIES ARE HUMAN. No one has earned special responsibilites and privileges that allow only them to attend a school sleep-over. It was just a lock-in, and we just wanted to have fun for a good cause.

Yes, the point of the lock-in was for everyone to have fun for a good cause. Great. So the subbies are invited not by UFU, but by the Uni High administration, two days before said lock in. Disregarding the fact that enough food has to be donated by local resturaunts, that logistically only two grades were supposed to be on one floor to prevent overcrowding, or that freshman vs. sophmore activites had already been planned, thus creating incredible amounts of stress for the lockin planners who thought that they were going to be faced with an extra 60 kids, that was still a horrible idea. Sure, if I was a subbie, I'd be annoyed. But not allowing subbies to go to a lock in is not a humanitarian crisis. The Invisible Children in Uganda are facing a humanitarian crisis. The point of this lockin was to have fun while raising money for these kids. When some freshmen and sophmores decided not to come because of the subbies, UFU lost money. The freshmen and sophmores who were still going felt that they weren't going to have as much fun because some of their friends were no longer attending, and they felt that the subbies being there was going to make the event less fun.The whole purpose of the lockin was challenged just so 10 subbies could go. I think that our school should be less concerned about how many subbies wrote their names on a piece of paper and focus more on what these events are supposed to be about.

Just out of curiosity: Are there any Subfreshman on the Gargoyle staff?

"We are trying to qestion this order of injustice and are being punished for it." Gosh, I really hope Uganda For Uni does something about this.

This time they made more money. I heard from someone who went that 20 subbies attended and several donated and couldn't make it.

"Just out of curiosity: Are there any Subfreshman on the Gargoyle staff? Posted by: Jenny Cooke | January 16, 2007 7:24 PM" The journalism class itself is limited to sophomores through seniors. Class members make up most of the staff, but anyone who is a Uni student is welcome to join the staff, including subbies. Currently no subbies write for the Gargoyle, but they are welcome to do so. Last year Rachel Harmon, Elizabeth Russell, and Isabel Vazquez contributed articles as subbies. (Use our search engine and type in their names; their articles are online.) David Porreca, Gargoyle adviser

Soooo.... does that mean I can write an article?

Yes. In the left column you'll see "SUBMISSIONS." Click "Contact Us" and let the editors know what you'd like to write, or submit an article if you've already written one. Feel free to contact me at my e-mail address (dporreca@uiuc.edu) if you have any questions. Good luck! David Porreca, Gargoyle adviser

When I was a subbie I didn't want to hang out with any of the older students. Subbies are so trapped in their own world on the third floor that, at least in my experience, there weren't many friends outside the Subfreshmen class. I would have just petitioned for a subfrenshmen lock-in, which to my knowledge, Mandy had already thought about planning. It seems that would have been more fun for subbies anyways.

I just don't get what upperclassmen all have against subbies. First of all in comparison to all the other middle schools, subbies do way more challanging homework and we rarely have field trips. The only time away from school was at the beginning of the year when we all went to that park. I think all upperclassmen need to accept that subbies are part of the school. Our decisions are just as important as yours if not more. Think about it. Do Seniors really have the right to make changes if they will only have those changes for one year. No. The people who will be most affected by the upperclassmen decisions are the people who will be here the longest. The Subfreshman. I am sick of all this animosity that subbies are getting from upperclassmen. All of you need to be careful because in the next four years when we become "important" we might not want to be nice about our decisions. Instead of trying to go against us all the time, keep in mind that the class of 2011 is a class that will not back down. We know our rights. We respect Prom and the Lounge but exclusion is only going to make us fight harder.

Sheesh Kahlilah, Marx has nothing on you when it comes to class warfare. I think you're overdramatizing this. Animosity? Rights? No one has any rights in (this) high school beyond those granted them by Miss Kovacs ;-).

Field trips? This isn't elementary school anymore. In college, you aren't going to get field trips, except for possible traveling during winter term. And no, your decisions aren't more important that ours. Subbie year is a rite de passage, of sorts. You earn the (ever so slightly) more rights and responsibility you get as Freshmen. You are preparing for an actual high school experience. And don't bring up the homework. We all survived cutting edge without any major injuries, and you guys can too.

Everyone needs to read the actual news story (UFU's latest lock-in sparks controversy) actually know what you're talking about. A lot of you are making great arguments, but unfortunately, the majority of these comments are based on information that is just wrong. UFU had a Jr/Sr lockin, and it went well. So we decided we could have another one, logically for the Fr/Sophs. If that went well, we might try to have another one this year, for the subbies. If we couldn't manage to plan it, we figured it wouldn't be the end of the end of the world, because the subbies would have plenty of opportunities in the future as well. But UFU was then notified that the subbies were coming to this lockin. It was annoying that we had no say in it, and that it was very short notice, but it was NOTHING AGAINST THE SUBBIES PERSONALLY!! I like the subbies just fine!! We were scared that we'd have too many people. The lockin was supposed to be on one floor only, because you need chaperones everywhere at all times. But if a lot of subbies were coming, we thought we'd need to open up another floor, (and to do that, we would need a lot more chaperones, which are pretty hard to get, if you can imagine). So it was an annoying situation, but it had nothing whatsoever to do with anyone being a subbie or not. Then a bunch of freshmen and sophomores started to talk about how they wouldn't come because the subbies were coming. THAT was very annoying indeed. But we figured if people were going to be that immature and petty, then they weren't worth stressing out about anyways. But then at the last minute, lots of people signed up. We had a total of 85 people, approximately 25 from each class. The lockin was just fine. The subbies seemed a little scared of/uncomfortable around the freshmen and sophomores, but they still ( i think) had a nice time. the freshmen got to feel big and strong because the subbies were there , and the sophomores got to feel really cool because they were "in charge". But mostly, I thought everyone got along just fine. I made a couple of friends that were sophomores that I wouldn't normally get to talk to, and I got to spend time with some subbies and freshmen too. i really enjoyed it too. why? because they're cool. yes, there is a difference between someone who has experienced all of high school and is about to go off to college (me), and someone who is barely beginning their teenage years. if you try to pretend there isn't, you're not thinking hard enough, and you're not giving enough credit to all the many experiences you will learn from and struggle through throughout high school. I am very different than I was when I was a subbie, and can fairly say that I have developed QUITE a lot. But that does not mean being condescending towards subbies because they're "subbies," or freshmen because you're a senior, or a 13-year old because you're 15. No. But you GOTTA give everyone the respect they deserve, who are you to pretend you're too good to give other people respect? You're not too good, whatever you are, a "mature" subbie, a freshman, a senior, whatever. I'm not either, and i know it. Seriously, get over yourselves, at least a little bit!

In my previous comment I said, "A lot of you are making great arguments, but unfortunately, the majority of these comments are based on information that is just wrong." Well, that's sort of an exaggeration, and I'll admit it :) However, I *do* think that everyone *should* read the news article about the Lock-in once more, in order to understand what actually happened (before passing judgement on something that may not even be true...)

actually thats not true much of the stuff we do in uni is the same stuff other students in schools like centenial and centrle do in their accelareted programn this is no the only place to get a higher level of any subject

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i> <b> <p> <br> <br />
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Word Verification
Please verify that you are human by correctly translating the image into text.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.